Comments of the Civic Education Module

17 October 2008

We also had an opportunity to reflect on and examine our own thinking processes and we learned the various ways of thinking and practised how to think laterally – in six different ways about the same issues: objectively, intuitively, in a logical and positive way and in a logical and negative way, in new and creative ways, and how to be in control over one’s thinking processes – making summaries, overviews and conclusions. I think the ability to look at issues from many different points of view can be taught and developed and it is very important because it makes tolerance, accommodation and the process of consensus building in a multi-ethnic, multi-religious, multi-lingual and multi-cultural nation easier.

Listening to what the other Pacific Islanders are doing in Civic Education was very enlightening and empowering. It helped me to foresee the realities that lie ahead of the NICE Team and how to capitalize on the opportunities that will be given to us to help us achieve our goals, as well as potential problems that await us and how those can be avoided or solved effectively.

We focused on the “who, what, when, where, how and why” questions relating to a Civic Education program and everyone was able to benefit from everyone else’s experience. We also looked at what the rest of the world is doing on Civic Education. Our specialists Mike Zulu, Oscar Tembo and Rose Mutayiza generously shared their knowledge, skills and experiences to the Pacific Islanders throughout the four days.

This short account is not even a summary of the benefits of attending the BRIDGE Civic Education module, it is just an off the cuff account of the 4 day experience on my first day back at work.


Tavenisa Diri

Community Civic Education Associate

NICE Project

“This is the personal opinion of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the institution she works for.”

Audience(s) for this workshop:
Modules used at this workshop:
Expected Outcomes: